‘We Can Fire Them in Probation, Right?’ A Dutch Employment Law Myth, Debunked.
Many international managers assume a Dutch 'proeftijd' is a flexible trial period. This costly myth can lead to invalid dismissals. Learn the strict rules and see how an AI copilot provides instant clarity.

The Myth: A Dutch probation period is an informal 'try-out' where you can dismiss an employee for any reason, no questions asked.
For managers accustomed to more flexible employment systems, the Dutch probation period (or proeftijd) seems like a familiar, low-risk way to test a new hire. The common assumption is that if things don't work out within the first month or two, you can part ways with a simple email, no strings attached. But this belief, as one company discovered, is a dangerously expensive oversimplification.
The Scenario: A Costly Miscalculation
Meet Mark, a UK-based manager for 'Global Forwarding BV', a logistics company expanding its Amsterdam office. He hires Sophie, a promising operations coordinator, on a one-year fixed-term contract. Wanting maximum flexibility, Mark adds a two-month probation period to the contract, which Sophie signs.
Six weeks in, Mark feels Sophie isn't proactive enough. Believing he is well within the probation period, he sends her an email stating that her employment is terminated, effective immediately. He's shocked a week later when Sophie’s legal counsel contacts him, claiming the dismissal was unlawful and demanding several months' salary in compensation.
What went wrong?
The Reality: Probation Periods Have Rigid, Unforgiving Rules
Mark fell for a classic Dutch employment law myth. In the Netherlands, the probation period is not a casual agreement; it is governed by strict statutory rules. If you get them wrong, the entire probation clause is void (nietig), meaning it's treated as if it never existed. From day one, Sophie was a regular employee with full dismissal protection.
The key rules are:
- It Must Be In Writing: The probation period must be explicitly agreed upon in the written employment contract.
- Duration is Strictly Dictated by Contract Length: This was Mark’s critical error. The maximum allowed probation period is tied to the duration of the employment contract:
- Contract for 6 months or less: No probation period is allowed.
- Contract longer than 6 months but shorter than 2 years: Maximum 1 month probation.
- Contract for 2 years or longer, or a permanent contract: Maximum 2 months probation.
For Sophie’s one-year contract, the maximum legal probation period was one month. Mark’s two-month clause exceeded this, rendering it legally void from the moment the contract was signed. His dismissal at week six was therefore an unlawful termination of a regular employment contract.
The AI Clarity Moment: Five Seconds to Avoid a Lawsuit
Before sending that termination email, Mark could have turned to his legal AI copilot for a simple gut check.
He could have asked LawYours.AI: “What is the maximum probation period for a 1-year employment contract in the Netherlands?”
Within seconds, the AI would have delivered a clear, direct answer:
“For an employment contract with a duration of more than six months but less than two years, the maximum permissible probation period is one (1) month, as stipulated in Article 7:652 of the Dutch Civil Code. A probation period exceeding this limit is considered void.”
This simple, five-second query would have immediately flagged the error in the contract and prevented a costly and stressful legal dispute.
3 Simple Rules to Remember
- Check the Math: Always calculate the maximum probation period based on the specific contract duration. Don't rely on a 'standard' template.
- Put it in Writing: Ensure the agreed-upon, legally correct probation period is included in the signed employment contract before the employee’s first day.
- Verify, Don't Assume: When in doubt, use a tool like LawYours.AI for an instant, reliable check. A quick question is always cheaper than a legal claim.
Disclaimer: This article describes a fictionalized scenario for illustrative and educational purposes only. It is not intended to be and should not be construed as legal advice. Any resemblance to actual events, entities, or individuals is purely coincidental.





